Gold & Silver Mutual Funds: The Best 2026 Investment Guide
Executive Summary
The contemporary investment landscape within the Indian mutual fund industry has witnessed a paradigm shift in commodity allocation, moving beyond the monolithic reliance on Gold Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) toward sophisticated, multi-asset architectures. This evolution is epitomized by the emergence of Gold and Silver Fund of Funds (FoFs), instruments designed to harness the dualistic nature of precious metals: Gold as the strategic anchor of wealth preservation, and Silver as the tactical lever for industrial growth and high-beta returns.
This report offers an exhaustive, expert-level analysis of the five preeminent strategies currently defining this space: the Motilal Oswal Gold and Silver ETFs FoF, the Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FoF, the Kotak Gold Silver Passive FoF, the Axis Gold and Silver Passive FoF, and the Mirae Asset Gold Silver Passive FoF. Through a rigorous deconstruction of their presentation data, allocation methodologies, and risk-adjusted performance profiles, this analysis seeks to determine the optimal vehicle for varying investor objectives.
The investigation reveals a fundamental bifurcation in portfolio architecture. On one side lie the Structuralists—Motilal Oswal and Edelweiss—who employ fixed-weight regimes (70:30 and 50:50, respectively) to harvest volatility through systematic rebalancing. On the other stand the Dynamists—Kotak, Axis, and Mirae Asset—who utilize active, quantitative, or fundamental overlays to time the market, attempting to capture alpha from the oscillating Gold-Silver Ratio (GSR).
Crucially, the analysis contextualizes performance through the lens of data cutoff disparities. With reporting dates ranging from August 2025 to January 2026, the perceived performance is heavily skewed by the parabolic "Silver Super-Cycle" of late 2025, where Silver delivered returns approaching 170%. Funds with later cutoff dates display artificially inflated metrics compared to those reporting earlier, necessitating a reconstruction of backtested performance to ensure a standardized comparison.
Ultimately, the report identifies Motilal Oswal (70:30) as the undisputed leader in volatility mitigation, offering a "crisis-proof" architecture suited for conservative capital protection. Conversely, Edelweiss (50:50) emerges as the vehicle with the highest unconstrained return potential, effectively functioning as a leveraged play on the green energy transition through its massive industrial silver exposure. The dynamic funds (Kotak, Axis, Mirae) occupy a "smart beta" middle ground, offering a theoretical superior risk-adjusted return profile by mitigating the "fat tail" drawdown risks inherent in Silver, albeit at the cost of capping maximum upside during mania phases.
1. The Macro-Strategic Thesis: The Bifurcation of Precious Metals
To evaluate the efficacy of any Gold and Silver FoF, one must first understand the underlying asset dynamics that these funds attempt to harness. The integration of Gold and Silver into a single instrument is not merely a diversification exercise; it is an attempt to merge two fundamentally distinct economic distinct asset classes that happen to share a monetary lineage.
1.1 Gold: The Monetary Anchor and Crisis Hedge
Gold remains the quintessential "Safe Haven." Its primary drivers are monetary debasement, real interest rates, and geopolitical instability. As noted in the Axis and Motilal Oswal presentations, Gold’s correlation with equity markets is structurally low, often turning negative during periods of extreme market stress, such as the Global Financial Crisis (2008) or the COVID-19 pandemic (2020).
The investment thesis for Gold is passive and defensive. It is a store of value that preserves purchasing power against the erosion of fiat currency. The presentations highlight that global central banks have doubled their gold purchases since 2022, signaling a re-monetization of the metal in the global reserve system. This creates a high "floor" for Gold prices, reducing downside risk but also limiting the explosive, speculative upside seen in industrial commodities.
1.2 Silver: The Industrial Beta and Green Energy Derivative
Silver, often termed "Gold on steroids," exhibits a dual personality. While it retains a monetary correlation with Gold (moving in the same direction ~70-80% of the time), its amplitude is significantly higher. However, the modern thesis for Silver, as emphasized by Edelweiss and Mirae Asset, acts increasingly as an industrial derivative.
The Edelweiss presentation underscores that nearly 50-60% of Silver demand is industrial, driven by burgeoning sectors such as photovoltaics (solar panels), electric vehicles (EVs), and 5G infrastructure. This imparts a pro-cyclical character to Silver; unlike Gold, Silver tends to perform well during economic expansions when manufacturing demand is high.
However, this industrial linkage introduces "Fat Tail" risks. As Mirae Asset’s analysis indicates, Silver exhibits extreme volatility clusters—periods of parabolic upside followed by devastating, prolonged drawdowns (or "long flats"). The distinct "fat tails" in Silver’s return distribution mean that timing is everything; a buy-and-hold strategy in Silver entails significantly higher standard deviation than Gold.
1.3 The Correlation Conundrum and the Case for Hybrid Funds
The raison d'être for these FoFs lies in the imperfect correlation between the two metals. While they generally move in tandem, the Gold-Silver Ratio (GSR)—the number of silver ounces required to buy one ounce of gold—oscillates wildly.
High GSR (e.g., >80): Implies Silver is undervalued relative to Gold.
Low GSR (e.g., <50 strong=""> Implies Silver is expensive relative to Gold.
By combining the two, these funds aim to smooth the equity curve. The Motilal Oswal presentation demonstrates that a combined portfolio historically offers a better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe Ratio) than holding either metal in isolation, primarily because the volatility of Silver is dampened by Gold, while the returns of Gold are amplified by Silver.
2. Structural Architectures: Deconstructing Allocation Strategies
The five funds under review employ radically different architectural approaches to solving the asset allocation puzzle. This is the single most critical determinant of their future performance and risk profiles.
2.1 The Fixed Allocation Regimes: Discipline Over Discretion
The fixed allocation strategies, employed by Motilal Oswal and Edelweiss, operate on the principle of systematic rebalancing. They do not attempt to forecast prices. Instead, they rely on the mechanical process of selling the outperforming asset to buy the underperforming asset, thereby harvesting volatility.
2.1.1 Motilal Oswal Gold and Silver ETFs FoF (70:30)
- Strategy: Strategic Fixed Allocation.
- Target Ratio: 70% Gold | 30% Silver.
- Philosophy: "Stability with a Kicker."
- Analysis: Motilal Oswal’s architecture is fundamentally conservative. By capping Silver exposure at 30%, the fund explicitly acknowledges Silver as a volatility enhancer rather than a core holding. The 70% Gold weighting ensures that the portfolio remains a reliable hedge against equity market volatility.
- Rebalancing Mechanism: The fund imposes a weight cap. If Silver rallies and the portfolio drifts, the fund automatically sells Silver to buy Gold, restoring the 70:30 balance.
- Suitability: This structure is optimized for investors seeking wealth preservation who wish to dip a toe into the Silver growth story without exposing their capital to 50% drawdowns.
2.1.2 Edelweiss Gold and Silver ETF FoF (50:50)
- Strategy: Equal-Weight Fixed Allocation.
- Target Ratio: 50% Gold | 50% Silver.
- Philosophy: "Maximum Industrial Beta."
- Analysis: Edelweiss adopts an aggressive stance. An equal capital allocation (50:50) does not result in an equal risk allocation. Since Silver is ~2x more volatile than Gold, a 50:50 portfolio derives approximately 65-70% of its total risk budget from Silver.
- Rebalancing Mechanism: The fund operates with a narrow tolerance band of +/- 5%. If the allocation drifts to 55:45, it triggers a rebalance.
- Suitability: This is a vehicle for aggressive growth. It is effectively a Silver fund with a Gold hedge. It is designed to capture the "super-cycles" in industrial demand (Green Energy transition), accepting higher volatility as the price of admission.
2.2 The Dynamic and Active Tilt Regimes: The Quest for Alpha
2.2.1 Kotak Gold Silver Passive FoF (Model-Driven)
- Strategy: Quantitative Dynamic Allocation.
- Mechanism: Proprietary Quantitative Model.
- Philosophy: "Rule-Based Arbitrage."
- Analysis: Despite the "Passive" moniker, Kotak's strategy is actively managed via a quantitative algorithm. The model likely monitors the GSR and momentum signals. When the GSR hits historical extremes (e.g., 100), the model would aggressively overweight Silver. When the GSR compresses (e.g., 65), it would shift back to Gold.
- Pros/Cons: This removes human emotion- a critical advantage in precious metals where FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) runs high. However, it introduces "Model Risk." If the GSR undergoes a structural shift (e.g., Silver re-rating permanently higher due to solar demand), the model might perpetually underweight Silver, expecting a reversion that never comes.
2.2.2 Axis Gold and Silver Passive FoF (Fundamental Dynamic)
- Strategy: Manager-Discretion Dynamic.
- Allocation Constraints: Gold (35-65%) | Silver (35-65%).
- Philosophy: "Macro-Fundamental Positioning."
- Analysis: Axis incorporates human judgment. The fund manager analyzes macroeconomic data (interest rates favor Gold), technicals (trendlines favor Silver), and supply/demand fundamentals (Silver deficits). This allows for nuanced positioning. For instance, during a geopolitical crisis, a quant model might signal "buy Silver" due to price momentum, but a human manager would know to "buy Gold" as the superior geopolitical hedge.
- Flexibility: The 35-65% bands provide significant leeway to tilt the portfolio, potentially generating alpha over a fixed 50:50 benchmark.
2.2.3 Mirae Asset Gold Silver Passive FoF (Active Tilt)
- Strategy: Baseline 50:50 with Active Tilt.
- Philosophy: "Risk-Managed Growth."
- Analysis: Mirae attempts to hybridize the two approaches. It maintains a "neutral" stance of 50:50 but allows for an "Active Tilt" based on technical and fundamental inputs.
- Fat Tail Management: Mirae’s presentation explicitly highlights the "Fat Tail" risks of Silver—the probability of extreme loss. The Active Tilt is likely designed as a risk-management overlay, reducing Silver exposure during technical breakdowns to protect capital, while riding the trend during breakouts.
3. The Data Cutoff Conundrum: Contextualizing Performance
A critical finding of this research is the distortion caused by reporting dates. The period spanning late 2025 was characterized by a parabolic "Silver Super-Cycle," where Silver prices rallied nearly 170%. Consequently, funds reporting data later in this cycle appear significantly superior solely due to timing.
| Fund | Reporting Cutoff | Market Context | Impact on Reported Returns |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kotak | Aug 29, 2025 | Pre-Peak. Silver rally was nascent. | Understated. Misses explosive Q4 gains. |
| Axis | Oct 31, 2025 | Mid-Rally. Silver ~₹1.48L/kg. | Moderate. Misses blow-off top in Dec/Jan. |
| Motilal | Dec 31, 2025 | Peak Rally. | High. Captures full super-cycle year. |
| Edelweiss | Jan 26, 2026 | Post-Peak/Plateau. | Maximized. Absolute peak of valuation. |
| Mirae | Jan 25, 2026 | Post-Peak/Plateau. | Maximized. Comparable to Edelweiss. |
4. Performance Attribution & Backtested Returns
4.1 Underlying Asset Performance (The Raw Material)
| Year | Gold (MCX Spot) | Silver (MCX Spot) | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| CY2025 | +75% | +167% | The "Super Cycle." |
| CY2024 | +21% | +18% | Recovery year. |
| CY2022 | +14% | +10% | Inflation fears. |
| CY2013 | -5% | -23% | The "Taper Tantrum" Crash. |
| CY2011 | +32% | +8% | Gold peaks; Silver lags. |
| CY2008 | +26% | -7% | Global Financial Crisis. |
4.2 Strategy Performance Reconstruction
| Scenario | Motilal (70:30 Fixed) | Edelweiss (50:50 Fixed) | Dynamic (Hypothetical) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 (Bull Run) | ~103% | ~121% | ~60% - 90% |
| 2013 (Bear Crash) | -10.4% | -14.0% | ~ -8.0% |
| 2008 (Liquidity Crisis) | +16.1% | +9.5% | ~ +20.0% |
Note: Dynamic performance is estimated. In 2025, dynamic models likely sold Silver early as GSR compressed, underperforming the fixed 50:50. In 2008, dynamic models would have shifted to Gold, outperforming.
4.3 Analysis of Return Potential
- The Bull Market King: Edelweiss (50:50). In a year like 2025, where Silver nearly triples, the mathematical advantage of a 50% weighting is insurmountable. Fixed allocation funds force the investor to participate in the mania.
- The Bear Market Defender: Motilal Oswal (70:30). In 2013 and 2008, the 70% Gold weighting acts as a parachute. When Silver crashes (as it often does during recessions), the heavy Gold allocation keeps the portfolio afloat or profitable.
- The Dynamic Arbitrage: Kotak/Axis. These funds offer the smoothest ride. In 2008, a dynamic fund would ideally have been 65% Gold, capturing the +26% return and avoiding the Silver loss. In 2025, however, they likely lagged Edelweiss because "rebalancing rules" often force selling too early during parabolic moves.
5. Volatility and Risk Profiles
5.1 The Volatility Hierarchy
| Strategy | Annualized Volatility | Risk Classification | Primary Risk Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edelweiss (50:50) | 19.0% - 22.0% | High | Industrial Beta / Silver Exposure. |
| Mirae Asset (Tilt) | 17.0% - 20.0% | Moderate-High | Execution Risk of Active Tilts. |
| Axis / Kotak | 16.0% - 18.0% | Moderate | Model Risk / GSR shifts. |
| Motilal (70:30) | 14.5% - 16.0% | Lowest | Price Risk (Dominated by Gold). |
5.2 The "Fat Tail" Reality
Mirae Asset’s presentation provides a crucial insight: Silver returns exhibit "Fat Tails". This means Silver experiences extreme events (3-sigma moves) far more frequently than a normal distribution would predict.
- Implication for 50:50 (Edelweiss): Investors must be prepared for months where the fund drops 15-20% purely due to a Silver correction.
- Implication for 70:30 (Motilal): The 30% cap effectively amputates the "Fat Tail" risk of Silver, ensuring that a Silver crash is a "flesh wound" rather than a "mortal blow" to the portfolio.
6. The Alpha of Rebalancing: A Technical Deep Dive
A distinct advantage of the Fixed Allocation funds (Motilal and Edelweiss) is the mathematical phenomenon known as Volatility Harvesting (or Shannon's Demon). Precious metals are highly correlated but have different amplitudes. When one metal rallies significantly, rebalancing "banks" those profits into the relative laggard, creating a compound advantage over long cycles.
6.1 How It Works
Precious metals are highly correlated but have different amplitudes.
- Scenario A: Gold is flat, Silver rallies 20%. The 50:50 portfolio becomes 45:55.
- Action: The fund sells the "expensive" Silver and buys "cheap" Gold to restore 50:50.
- Scenario B: Silver subsequently corrects 10%.
- Result: The fund successfully "banked" the Silver profits and bought Gold at a relative low.
6.2 Comparison
- Edelweiss (50:50): Harvests this effect most aggressively because the position sizes are equal. The rebalancing bonus is maximised when assets are volatile and exhibit mean-reversion.
- Motilal (70:30): Harvests less volatility because the 30% Silver weight generates smaller absolute profits to redistribute into Gold.
- Dynamic Funds: May miss this mechanical advantage if their models dictate "riding the trend" rather than rebalancing.
7. Structural & Tax Implications
A DIY investor attempting to replicate these strategies by buying separate ETFs would incur Capital Gains Tax every time they rebalanced. In contrast, the Fund of Funds (FoF) structure executes rebalancing internally, deferring taxes until the units are finally redeemed by the investor. This makes FoFs mathematically superior for high-turnover commodity strategies.
8. Final Comparative Verdict
8.1 Which Fund Strategy Appears the Least Volatile?
Winner: Motilal Oswal Gold and Silver ETFs FoF (70:30 Strategy)
- The Anchor Thesis: The 70% allocation to Gold provides a mathematical floor to volatility. Gold’s standard deviation is historically ~30-40% lower than Silver’s. By anchoring the portfolio in the monetary metal, Motilal Oswal creates a defensive structure.
- Crisis Resilience: In every major liquidity crisis (2008, 2020), Silver initially crashes while Gold holds firm. The 70:30 strategy ensures that during these maximum-stress periods, the portfolio drawdown is minimized compared to peers.
- Verdict: This is the "Sleep Well" option. It captures the essence of precious metals (wealth preservation) while accepting a modest growth kicker from Silver.
8.2 Which Fund Strategy Has the Highest Return Potential?
Winner: Edelweiss Gold & Silver ETF FoF (50:50 Strategy)
- The Beta Play: "Return Potential" in this asset class is a function of Silver exposure. Silver is the high-octane fuel. A 50% weighting provides the highest systematic exposure to Silver’s industrial super-cycles (Green Energy, AI hardware demand).
- The "Fat Tail" Capture: While dynamic funds might trim Silver exposure during a parabolic run (fearing a bubble), the fixed 50:50 strategy forces the fund to participate fully (up to the rebalancing band). As evidenced by the ~117% return in the 2025 cycle, this structural commitment to high-beta assets delivers the highest absolute returns during bull markets.
- Verdict: This is the "Wealth Creation" option. It is a leveraged play on the industrial economy and monetary debasement, suited for aggressive investors with a long time horizon.
8.3 The "Smart Middle" (Risk-Adjusted Choice)
Winner: Axis / Kotak (Dynamic Strategies)
While not winning the absolute "Least Volatile" or "Highest Return" categories, these funds likely offer the best Risk-Adjusted Return (Sharpe Ratio). By dynamically shifting weights, they attempt to capture 70-80% of the upside while cutting off the worst 20% of the downside. They are the ideal "Core Holding" for investors who want exposure to the asset class but lack the conviction to choose between Gold (Safety) or Silver (Growth).
8.4 Summary Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Motilal Oswal | Edelweiss | Axis | Kotak | Mirae Asset |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategy | Fixed 70:30 | Fixed 50:50 | Dynamic (35-65) | Quant Model | Active Tilt |
| Primary Driver | Preservation | Industrial Beta | Skill-Based | Arbitrage | Technical |
| Volatility | Lowest | Highest | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate-High |
| Upside | Capped | Uncapped | Alpha Seeking | Alpha Seeking | Alpha Seeking |
Official Resources (Direct Plans)
Join the conversation